(PS) Rogers v. County of Sacramento
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIM EDWARD ROGERS, No. 2:24-cv-0237-DJC-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff proceeds without counsel1 and seeks to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF 18 No. 1, 2.) Plaintiff has also filed a motion to consolidate cases. (ECF No. 12.) For the reasons set 19 forth below, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this case is denied. Within 30 days 20 of the days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall pay the $405.00 court costs, seek…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Maria Escobedo v. Apple American GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. William F. McQuade and Wilma N. McQuadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Lister v. Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Olivares v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Evans v. CroomCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.