Legal Opinion

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 40:55D-19 FOR A DETERMINATION THAT THE MONTVILLE-WHIPPANY 230KV TRANSMISSION PROJECT IS REASONABLY NECESSARY FOR THE SERVICE, CONVENIENCE OR WELFARE OF THE PUBLIC (NEW JERSEY BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITIES)

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 1, 2019No. A-2183-17T3Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3. SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2183-17T3 IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT COMPANY PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 40:55D-19 FOR A DETERMINATION THAT THE MONTVILLE-WHIPPANY 230 KV TRANSMISSION PROJECT IS REASONABLY NECESSARY FOR THE SERVICE, CONVENIENCE OR WELFARE…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Henry v. Rahway State PrisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  3. In re StallworthSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  4. In Re CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  5. Borough of Roselle v. Public Service Electric & Gas Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API