Legal Opinion

Littlefield v. Hays

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 26, 1980No. 9144PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUNTISS, Justice.

This appeal from a summary judgment in favor of the defendant doctor in a medical malpractice case presents one question: Is Art. 5.82, § 4, of the Insurance Code, the two year statute of limitations on tort claims against insured doctors, constitutional? 1 We conclude that it is and affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The undisputed facts set out in the parties’ affidavits filed in support of and in response to appellee Dr. John W. Hays’ motion for summary judgment are as follows. Appellant Sandra Littlefield was Dr. Hays’ patient. She had previously undergone a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Smith v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Robinson v. WeaverTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Texas National Guard Armory Board. v. McCrawTexas Supreme Court · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Phillips v. Sharpstown General Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  3. Doran v. ComptonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Melendez v. Beal, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  5. Neagle v. Nelson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API