Legal Opinion
ABDULLAH NAJM ABDULLAH NAJM v. CITY OF PORTLAND
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 29, 2018No. 3:17-cv-01714Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ABDULLAH NAJM ABDULLAH NAJM, Case No. 3:17 -cv-01714-SB Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. CITY OF PORTLAND, Defendant. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Abdullah Najm Abdullah Najm filed an Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees (ECF No. 16), requesting an award of attorney’s fees, costs, and litigation expenses in the amount of $8,882.32. For the reasons set forth below, the district judge should grant the motion and award attorney’s fees in the amount of $8,377.50, and costs and expenses in the amount of $504.82,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Welch v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Darnella BARJON and Lee Duran, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.