Legal Opinion

City of St. Louis v. Benjamin Moore & Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 12, 2007No. SC 88230PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.1

INTRODUCTION

The city of St. Louis has a program to assess, abate and remediate lead paint be*113cause it can be harmful when ingested by children. The city filed this public nuisance claim against companies that put lead paint into the stream of commerce seeking to recover its costs for the program. The city could not connect any specific defendant to any specific abatement project. Correctly relying on Zafft v. Eli Lilly & Co., 676 S.W.2d 241 (Mo. banc 1984), the trial court concluded that the evidence was not sufficient to prove causation and entered judgment for the defendants.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon HospitalSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  3. Zafft v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. State Ex Inf. Ashcroft v. Kansas City Firefighters Local No. 42Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Chicago, Burlington, & Quincy Railroad v. WoolfolkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. State v. Lead Industries, Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. People v. Conagra Grocery Prods. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Wagner v. Bondex International, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Richey v. PhilippMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API