People v. Renfro
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERREN, J.
While confined as a mentally disordered offender (MDO) (Pen. Code, § 2960 et seq.), Donald Renfro physically attacked hospital personnel. Prosecuted for offenses arising from this incident, Renfro entered into a plea bargain that not only included a guilty plea to one offense, but also declared that the offense was not caused or aggravated by a severe mental disorder and could not be used as a qualifying offense for a subsequent MDO commitment. (§ 2962, subd. (b).)
Before his release from prison, the Board of Prison Terms determined that Renfro was an MDO and, contrary to his…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re AlvernazCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. KimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. SchellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Berman v. CateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.