Legal Opinion

People v. Renfro

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 2004No. B172451PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERREN, J.

While confined as a mentally disordered offender (MDO) (Pen. Code, § 2960 et seq.), Donald Renfro physically attacked hospital personnel. Prosecuted for offenses arising from this incident, Renfro entered into a plea bargain that not only included a guilty plea to one offense, but also declared that the offense was not caused or aggravated by a severe mental disorder and could not be used as a qualifying offense for a subsequent MDO commitment. (§ 2962, subd. (b).)

Before his release from prison, the Board of Prison Terms determined that Renfro was an MDO and, contrary to his…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. In Re AlvernazCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. People v. TaylorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. People v. KimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People v. SchellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Berman v. CateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API