Legal Opinion
Collins & Aikman Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 5, 1993No. 252PA92Published
1Opinion of the Court
436 S.E.2d 243 (1993)
335 N.C. 91
COLLINS & AIKMAN CORPORATION
v.
The HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company.
No. 252PA92.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
November 5, 1993.
Parker, Poe, Adams & Bernstein by Irvin W. Hankins, III and Josephine H. Hicks, Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellee.
Patterson, Dilthey, Clay & Bryson by Ronald C. Dilthey and Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog by Susan K. Burkhart, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant The Hartford Acc. and Indem. Co.
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae by Stephanie Hutchins Autry and Peter M. Foley, Raleigh, for amicus curiae…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. FoustSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Day v. WoodworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. Westchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.