Legal Opinion

Painter v. Sutherland

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1933No. 3696PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, C. J.

For an assault committed upon him by one Williams, appellee recovered damages against Williams and against his codefendants, the Sutherlands, copartners by whom both Williams and appellee were employed. The copartners, employers, have appealed. The trial was to the court.

As the appeal was originally presented, sole, reliance was upon the proposition that Williams, in assaulting appellee, acted outside the scope of his employment, and that consequently there could be no liability on the part of appellants. This fatal defect in the cause of action is said to appear, first, in the complaint;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. King v. DohertyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
  2. In Re Jaramillo's EstateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Pankey v. Hot Springs Nat. BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Claughton v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Springer Transfer Co. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Lopez v. LuceroNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API