Legal Opinion

Fangmeier v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1925No. 25,891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one by a flue borer in defendant’s shops at Coffeyville, to recover damages for personal injury sustained when a hot particle was blown back as he was cleaning a flue in an engine, and struck his eyeball. The verdict and judgment were for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

At a former trial a demurrer to plaintiff’s evidence was sustained. On appeal, the judgment in defendant’s favor was reversed and a new trial was ordered. (Fangmeier v. Railroad Co., 115 Kan. 496, 223 Pac. 310.) The case now presented is so different from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Arizona Employers' Liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Lively v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  5. Burke v. Union Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Phillips v. Commercial National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API