Legal Opinion

Roulhac v. . Miller

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Civil ActioN tried at Spring Term, 1883, of Orange Superior Court, before Gilmer, J. The defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtShiti-i, C. J.

The present suit is upon a written undertaking executed by the defendants, as sureties upon the discharge from arrest of the principal, William Garl Browne, against whom the plaintiff was then prosecuting her action for the recovery of a money demand. The undertaking is as follows:

ANNA K. Roulhac, Executrix, v. Wm. Gael Browne.

Whereas, the above-named Wm. Garl Browne has been arrested in this action, now, therefore, we, Wm, Garl Browne, John Miller and John Gatling undertake in the sum of eight hundred dollars, that if the defendant is discharged from arrest, he shall at all times render…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parker v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  2. Rogers v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  3. Parker Gatling v. . W. O. HouseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  4. Roulhac v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Patton v. . GashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Junge v. MacKnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API