Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Junge v. MacKnight

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1904Published

ActioN by W. P. Junge and another against H. P. Mac-Knight, heard by Judge G. M. Goólce, at September Term, 1903, of the Superior Court of Moore County. Prom a judgment for the plaintiff the defendant appealed.

1Concurrence

ClaeK, O. J.,

concurring. The Code, section 385, allows a judgment by default final at the return term “on failure of the defendant to answer,” upon a verified complaint *108alleging an express or implied contract to pay a “sum of money fixed by tlie terms of the contract, or capable of being ascertained therefrom by computation.” And section 386 provides: “In all other actions, except those mentioned in the preceding section, when the defendant shall fail to answer and upon a like proof (as to service of summons, etc.), judgment by default and inquiry shall be had at the return term, and inquiry…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Battle v. BairdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Stewart v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Brown v. Rhinehart Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  4. Jones v. . BestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  5. McLeod v. . NimocksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API