Leever v. Hamill
Indiana Supreme Court
•Erom the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBiddle, C. J.
Complaint by Michael Hamill, against Philip A. Leever, for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment.
An answer was filed, various rulings upon demurrers had, and exception taken; but, as the appellant has waived the discussion of these questions in his brief, we shall waive their statement and examination.
Issues of fact were joined, a trial by jury had, and a verdict for appellee found.-
A motion for a new trial was made, founded on the following causes:
1. The verdict is contrary to law;
2. The verdict is not sustained by evidence;
3. The damages are excessive; and,
4. The verdict is not…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Clegg v. WaterburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Darnell v. SalleeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Woodman v. PrescottSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1890
- Peake v. Milaca State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913