Legal Opinion

State v. Castillo

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 12, 1979No. 2686-3PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, J.

The defendant, Robert J. Castillo, appeals the denial of his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty to the crime of forgery. He also attacks the validity of his conviction under the habitual criminal statute, RCW 9.92.090.

On September 8, 1977, Robert Castillo was charged with the crime of forgery. At the arraignment, he entered a plea of guilty. Thereafter, a supplemental information was filed charging the defendant with having attained the status of a habitual criminal pursuant to RCW 9.92.090.

Mr. Castillo challenges the quality of legal representation he received during the habitual criminal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. In Re HarincarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. State v. JackovickWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. BraxtonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. FrederickWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. State v. SerrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  4. State v. FrederickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  5. Wasson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API