State v. Frederick
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Daniel Frederick appeals his conviction following jury trial for first degree robbery 1 while armed with a deadly weapon. 2 He also appeals his sentencing as a habitual criminal. We affirm.
During their deliberations on the special weapons verdict, jurors submitted the following question to the trial judge concerning the deadly weapon interrogatories: "Does the law preclude a knife of less than three inches of being a deadly weapon?" After consulting with both counsel in chambers, the trial judge refused defense counsel's request for an instruction to affirmatively explain the applicable law…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. HolsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Wood v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. DaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. StarrishWashington Supreme Court · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. CalvinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. FrederickWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- In re the Personal Restraint of HegneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- State v. SerrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.