Teubner v. City of Waterbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.
The plaintiffs in these two cases are ten members of the fire department in the city of Waterbury who claim that they are entitled to additional compensation for overtime work performed since the adoption, in 1958, of a so-called forty-two-hour work-week program for the department. The six plaintiffs in the Griffin case also seek additional compensation which they claim by reason of their promotion to higher ranking positions in the department. The trial court rendered judgments for the defendant, and the plaintiffs have appealed.
Originally, the four plaintiffs in the Teubner case also sought…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Road Commission v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- Rice's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Old Colony Gardens, Inc. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Emerick v. Monaco & Sons Motor Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Quarry v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bredice v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Heffernan v. New Britain Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Waterbury Homeowners Ass'n v. City of WaterburyConnecticut Superior Court · 1969