Legal Opinion
Paterson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 21, 2004No. CIV.A.03-95JPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF COURT
GIBSON, District Judge.
OVERVIEW
This case is before the Court on a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendant, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. The original complaint arose from a claim for reinstatement of benefits under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). For the purposes of this motion in accordance with Local Rule of Court 56.1 E, the Court will accept as true all facts not in material dispute and will make any necessary inferences in favor of the nonmoving party. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 28…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Abraham WELDON, Appellant, v. KRAFT, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- William J. Kross v. Western Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Berger v. Edgewater Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Santiago Amaro v. The Continental Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.