Legal Opinion

Malloy v. Carroll

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 24, 1930PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is a bill in equity in which the plaintiffs, John Malloy and Martin D. Farrell, seek to establish their rights as members of the Boston Cement & Asphalt Finishers’ Union, Local 534, hereinafter called the union. The defendants John Carroll, Otto B. Nelson, John Erlandson, *528Louis Pratt, and Michael O’Rourke, prior to April 30, 1928, were for some years members of the union. The defendant, the United. Building Trades Council of Boston and Vicinity, hereinafter called the council, is a voluntary association, composed of five or "more members appointed by various trade unions in the field of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moustakis v. Hellenic Orthodox SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Correia v. Supreme Lodge of the Portuguese Fraternity of the United StatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Barbrick v. HuddellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  4. Clark v. MorganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Agrippino v. PerrottiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Malloy v. CarrollMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  2. Donovan v. TraversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Aulich v. CraigmyleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  4. Snay v. CollisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Walsche v. SherlockNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API