Spaulding Mfg. Co. v. Dill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Pontotoc County; Action by The Spaulding Mfg. Co., a partnership, against W. H. Dill, H. G. Malot, and M. W. Krause. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
HARRISON, C.
This is an appeal from the judgment of the district court of Pontotoc county. The petition in error was filed in this court March 3, 1910. The cause, was assigned for submission at the November term, 1911. No briefs have been filed for plaintiff in error; no counsel noted for defendants in error.
Rule 7 of this court, 38 Okla. vii, 137 Pac. ix, requires the plaintiff in error in each civil cause to serve his brief on counsel for defendant in error within forty days after the petition in error has been filed, and at the same time file fifteen copies of his brief with the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Citizens' Nat. Bank of Chickasha v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Davis v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Lebreton v. SwartzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904