Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Stephens

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1992No. 21368PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice:

In this original proceeding in prohibition, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) asks us to prevent the Circuit Court of McDowell County from enforcing an order entered July 10, 1992, which held State Farm in contempt for failing to comply with court-ordered discovery and assessed a penalty against State Farm of $5,000 for each day of continued noncompliance. State Farm contends that the trial court’s discovery order was oppressive and unduly burdensome and that the contempt citation was, therefore, unwarranted. We agree, and we grant the writ of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling ConsultantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  3. Hinkle v. BlackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Graziani v. Committee on Legal EthicsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,322 Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Financial Group of Texas, Inc., William H. HowtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. CanadyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Medical Assurance of West Virginia, Inc. v. RechtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Bartles v. HinkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Allstate Insurance v. GaughanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API