Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided December 8, 2003Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Representative Reynolds,

¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following question:

May a legislator, during his or her term of office, be employed for compensation as either a part-time consultant for, or executive director of, a community action agency?

I. Background

¶ 1 Your question concerns the propriety of an employment relationship between a current legislator and a community action agency. To analyze such propriety we must first set forth, (1) the constitutional and statutory provisions1 governing employment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daily Leader v. Cameron, AuditorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  2. City of Duncan v. BinghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  3. People ex rel. Throop v. LangdonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Armstrong v. Sewer Improvement Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API