Legal Opinion

Lotosky v. University of Rochester

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided January 28, 2002No. 6:99-cv-06346PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION and ORDER

SIRAGUSA, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff filed a complaint in this Court on August 11, 1999, alleging eight different causes of action and seeking compensatory and punitive damages. Her complaint lists causes of action arising under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, including an allegation of discriminatory termination from her employment, retaliatory termination of her employment, defendants’ alleged failure to accommodate her religious beliefs, and a hostile work environment. She makes similar claims under the New York State Human Rights Law. See N.Y. Exec.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bandalos v. Stony Brook University Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API