Cook v. St. Louis & Keokuk Railroad
Supreme Court of Missouri
*Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, Judge
Action on contract. The petition alleged that defendant had employed plaintiff as its civil engineer, at a salary of $300 per month; that plaintiff was in defendant’s employ in such capacity from the twentieth day of August, 1869, until •the first day of May, 1870, a period of eight months and ten days, and that the compensation plaintiff was entitled to therefor was $2500, for which judgment was asked.
The answer denied that defendant ever employed plaintiff as civil engineer, or in any other capacity at $300 per month, or any other sum; denied that it agreed to pay him said sum or any other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People ex rel. Oebricks v. Superior CourtNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- State v. RaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Rose v. BatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
- State v. StumboSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
- Richardson v. FarmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. CantlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Iron Mountain Bank v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- State v. MusickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Breckinridge v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
- Mayor of Liberty v. BurnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.