Legal Opinion

Cook v. St. Louis & Keokuk Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1874PublishedCited by 23 opinions

*Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, Judge

Action on contract. The petition alleged that defendant had employed plaintiff as its civil engineer, at a salary of $300 per month; that plaintiff was in defendant’s employ in such capacity from the twentieth day of August, 1869, until •the first day of May, 1870, a period of eight months and ten days, and that the compensation plaintiff was entitled to therefor was $2500, for which judgment was asked.

The answer denied that defendant ever employed plaintiff as civil engineer, or in any other capacity at $300 per month, or any other sum; denied that it agreed to pay him said sum or any other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Oebricks v. Superior CourtNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. State v. RaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  3. Rose v. BatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
  4. State v. StumboSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  5. Richardson v. FarmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. CantlinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Iron Mountain Bank v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  3. State v. MusickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Breckinridge v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  5. Mayor of Liberty v. BurnsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API