Legal Opinion

Bolus v. Carnicella, Esquire

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 5, 2020No. 4:15-cv-01062Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRIAN BOLUS, et al., No. 4:15-CV-01062 Plaintiffs, (Judge Brann) v. AMY CARNICELLA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION NOVEMBER 5, 2020 Pending before this Court is Plaintiffs’1 Motion to Compel production of 283 documents currently in Defendants’ possession.2 Defendants assert that the documents are protected by the work-product and deliberative-process privileges. The Court concludes that neither privilege applies. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ motion to compel is granted. 1 Plaintiffs include: Brian Bolus, Karen…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Steven Wynne v. Tufts University School of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API