Legal Opinion
Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc. v. Propet USA, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided April 1, 2003No. Nos. 02-1259, 02-1304, 02-1341PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
SCHALL, Circuit Judge.
Hoekerson-Halberstadt, Inc. (“HHI”) sued Propet USA, Inc. (“Propet”) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”) in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,322,895 (“the ’895 patent”). After a jury found that Propet had willfully infringed the patent, the district court entered final judgment in favor of HHI against Propet, awarding HHI a reasonable royalty, enhanced damages, attorney fees, prejudgment interest, and costs. Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc. v. Nike, Inc., No. 91-1720 (Ref. No. 96-3160)…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Northbrook Digital, LLC v. Vendio Services, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Rice v. Petedge, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
- Saint-Gobain Autover USA, Inc. v. Xinyi Glass North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
- McGill Technology Ltd. v. Gourmet Technologies, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Pfm Air, Inc. v. Dr. Ing. Hc. F. Porsche AgDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.