Skelton v. Spencer
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentBistline, Justice
I cannot agree with the majority that the three separate claims of Rigby & Thatcher can properly be brought and pursued to judgment in this single particular enforcement of lien proceeding. To help clarify these rather involved proceedings, I will briefly explain the nature of the three separate claims as they appear to me:
1.Removal of executor (Civil No. 4193, Bonneville County, Magistrate Division). As to the removal of the executor and ratification of the children’s disclaimers, Rigby & Thatcher had, prior to the exchange of letters re fees with Spencer, filed a petition in the probate…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- In Re PaschalSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Collins v. ThuringerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933
- Johnson v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.