Legal Opinion

Goeltz v. Town of Ashland

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1890PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Ashland County. The case is stated in the opinion. The plaintiff appeals from a judgment on the verdict in favor of the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtTaylob, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for causing the death of Otto Goeltz, by the carelessness and negligence of the town of Ashland. The negligence alleged against the town is that it carelessly permitted an open hole to exist in one of its public streets, which was filled with water to the depth of six féet or thereabouts, and that said Otto Goeltz, while passing along said public street, stopped to fill a rubber ball and get a drink from the water in said hole or well, and in attempting to do so fell into the water and was drowned. There was no cover over this hole or well at the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Prideaux v. City of Mineral PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Kelley v. Town of Fond du LacWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Cartright v. Town of BelmontWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Hawes v. Town of Fox LakeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  5. James v. City of PortageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Reed v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Herndon v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Stricker v. Town of ReedsburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. City of Guthrie v. SwanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  5. Corrigan v. Board of CommissionersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API