Mayor of Baltimore v. Ulman
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, J.
In the year 1887 the authorities of the city of Baltimore graded, paved and curbed. North avenue, between Pennsylvania avenue and the western city limits. This was done under what was known as “ Ordinance No. 100 of 1886,” passed under the supposed authority of the Act of 1874, ch. 218.
In Ulman vs. Mayor, &c., of Baltimore, et al., 72 Md., 587, this Court decided that the assessment levied on Mrs. Ulman’s property under that ordinance was null and void, as it “ made no provision for notice to and hearing of any proprietor whose land adjoined North avenue, upon the question, what proportion of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Mills v. CharletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Mayor of Baltimore v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
- Ulman v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- County Commissioners v. Union Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Herzinger v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Jones v. GordyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
- Dinneen v. RiderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
- Comptroller of the Treasury v. Glenn L. Martin Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Anderson v. City of OcalaSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.