Legal Opinion

Cecil v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1922No. 7043PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

LATTIMORE, Judge.

— Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Titus County of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at Confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Appellant complains because the court refused certain requested charges in which he sought to have the jury instructed that unless the transportation of the liquor in question was for the purpose of sale, appellant would not be guilty of any offense. There appear in the record no bills of exception reserved to the refusal of such special charges. There is no statement upon either of said charges as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MitchumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Barrios v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  3. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Gibbs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McNeil v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Harrison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Weddington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Welchek v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API