Legal Opinion

Welchek v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 22, 1922No. 7136PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

January 17, 1923.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant raised the point as to the sufficiency of the second count in the indictment under which the conviction was had. We disposed of it in our original opinion in the following language.

“There is some question raised as to the sufficiency of the indictment by motion to quash and also in arrest of judgment, but as same have not been perpetuated in bills of exceptions they will not be discussed.”

In the motion for rehearing our attention is called to the fact that in, the orders of the court overruling the motion to quash, and in arrest of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crowley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Ex Parte MitchumCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. U. S. Petit v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Plachy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Copeland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Craft v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API