Legal Opinion
Probuilders Specialty Insurance v. Double M. Construction
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided July 10, 2015No. Case No. 2:13-CV-2156 JCM (NJK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is plaintiff Probuilders Insurance Company’s (“Pro-builders”) motion for summary judgment. (Doc. #36). Defendant Double M Construction dba Classic Homes (“Double M”), filed a response, (doc. # 64), and Probuild-ers filed a reply, (doc. # 67).
*11761. Background
i. Facts and procedural history
This case involves an insurance coverage dispute. Probuilders is a registered risk retention group in Nevada Double M, a general contractor, developed Richland Estates, a housing development in Pah-rump, Nevada. (Doc. #67, p. 2). On August TO, 2012,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alps Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Kalicki Collier, LLPDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
- Nautilus Insurance Company v. Access Medical, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019