Legal Opinion

Watson v. M'Nairy

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 23, 1809PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION of the Court, by

Judge Bibb.

— In asfc action of debt, M’Nairy declared upon a writing under seal, dated, &c. by which the defendants, Watson and M’Call, bound themselves to pay him, s‘in the month of June ensuing the date, one horse, at the value of thirty pounds.” He averred the defendants had not delivered the horse in June, (although his residence in, Fayette was well known to them,) nor upon demand, “ on the day of —.-, in the year ——See. whereby an action accrued to him to demand and have the said sum of thirty pounds in money ; and then assigns breach in non payment of the money.…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Van AukenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Butcher v. CarlileSupreme Court of Virginia · 1855
  3. Hudspeth v. Gray, Durrive & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1843
  4. Poppleton v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Wilson v. HicksonIndiana Supreme Court · 1822

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API