Wilson v. Hickson
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Floyd Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.
Judgment on a domestic attachment. Affidavit by N. Hickson that J. Wilson was indebted to him in the sum *231of 1,193 dollars, with interest, &c., upon a writing obligatory assigned to him by T. Hickson. It appears that an attachment issued and was returned executed; but the attachment is not set out in the record. After the return of the attachment, the plaintiff filed his declaration in debt, on a note under seal for the payment of 1,193 dollars “in United States’ bank notes or its branches.”
Fitch, for the plaintiff. Nelson, for the defendant.
Independently of the absence of the attachment,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Watson v. M'NairyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1809
- Campbell v. WeisterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1822
3Cited by6 opinions
- Columbia v. AmosIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
- Cassady v. LaughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1832
- Purcell v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
- Wingfield v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Virginia · 1808
- Wingfield v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Virginia · 1808
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.