Pennsylvania Exchange Bank v. Lasko
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
After a six-day trial before Judge and jury — resulting in the cause being set for retrial because of the jury’s disagreement — the plaintiff has made certain motions, as follows: (1) for summary judgment on six of the seven causes of action (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 113); (2) to strike the defendant’s answer as to the remaining count alleged in the complaint as sham and frivolous and directing an inquest (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 103); and (3) to conform the pleadings to the proof. Voluminous affidavits and exhibits are 'submitted, as well as a portion of the trial transcript. (Parenthetically,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chysky v. . Drake Brothers Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Turner v. Edison Storage Battery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hanna v. Florence Iron Co. of WisconsinNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Grobman v. FreimanNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Bentrovato v. CrinnionNew York Supreme Court · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re MendenhallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1980
- Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. C & J Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1986
- W. R. Simmons & Associates Research, Inc. v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962