Legal Opinion
Dornack v. Apfel
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 16, 1999No. Civ. 97-2897 (JMR/RLE)Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBAUM, District Judge.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-titled matter, it is — •
ORDERED:
1. That the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 5] is denied.
2. That the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 10] is denied.
3. That the matter is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings in accordance with the views expressed in this Report.
4. That, pursuant to the holding in Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 113…
2Cases cited79 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.