Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Nixon

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 12, 1981No. 406PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEMURO, Judge:

This case is before the court on a direct appeal from a judgment of sentence by a judge, sitting without a jury, for Escape. 1 Post-Trial motions were denied and appellant, Eugene Nixon, was sentenced to a term of two (2) to four (4) years.

The sole question raised by appellant on appeal is whether or not he should be afforded the benefits of the decision of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. Bus-sey, 486 Pa. 221, 404 A.2d 1309 (1979) [Hereinafter Bussey], requiring an explicit waiver of Miranda 2 rights. For the reasons discussed below, we refuse to apply…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. DavenportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Kuchinic v. McCrorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. SpeaksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Fleming v. FlemingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. Adams, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Berks County1990
  5. Commonwealth v. SpeaksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API