Legal Opinion

Rice v. Comtek Manufacturing of Oregon, Inc.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided March 27, 1990No. Civ. 89-1198-JUPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

REDDEN, Chief Judge:

Magistrate Juba filed his Findings and Recommendation on March 6, 1990. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir.1983); See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dish, 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Juba’s Findings and Recommendation (doc. # 17) in its…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Andrea Dworkin Priscilla Moree Judith Fouts v. Hustler Magazine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. Hall v. May Department Stores Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Richard Fredericks v. Gary Wright George Burke City of Forest Grove and John Doe, a Fictitious PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Sexsmith v. MARRIOTT INTERN., INC.District Court, D. Oregon · 1995
  3. Rose v. Anderson Hay & Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Rose v. Anderson Hay & Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Tallman v. SpencerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API