Legal Opinion

McCullough v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter referred to as defendants, were convicted of grand larceny. The jury fixed their punishment at confinement in the State Penitentiary for a period of not more than ten years. They were sentenced accordingly. The Trial Judge overruled their motion for a new trial. They have duly perfected their appeal to this Court and have assigned errors.

The first three assignments of error relate to the suffiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction. They are:

“(1) The evidence preponderated in favor of the defendants.
“ (2) No trespass was ever proved, nor any other…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McBee v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Ryall v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Defrese v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Metcalf v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  2. Greer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  3. Carter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  4. Greer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API