Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Hoskins

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided May 17, 1938No. Civ. A. No. 92202PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTurrentine, J.

—Based on a judgment for necessaries, to wit, house rent, which remained unsatisfied, defendants were cited into court for examination respecting property which they owned and which was subject to execution by court order for the payment of the judgment, and which was not exempt from execution. At the hearing it was established that the defendant Lawrence Hoskins was employed under a Works Progress Administration project at the Eleventh Naval District in San Diego, doing clerical work, and that he received therefor a monthly salary of one hundred nine and no/100 dollars ($109); that at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Security-First National Bank v. PiersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Brown v. Creditors of EstateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Medical Finance Assn. v. ShortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Medical Finance Ass'n v. KarnesAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1938
  3. Young v. WrightIdaho Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API