Legal Opinion

Doe v. Banos

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided August 20, 2013No. Civil Action No. 10-cv-1338 (NLH)(AMD)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HILLMAN, District Judge.

Beginning in November 2006, and continuing at least through November 2009, in order for a student to participate in extracurricular activities, such as a school-sponsored sports team, the Haddonfield Board of Education (“HBOE”) required the student’s parent to provide unqualified consent to a school policy that precludes the child from any involvement with drugs and alcohol, on or off school grounds. The constitutionality of this policy, known as the 24/7 Policy, has been challenged in other proceedings before this Court and in the state court system.1 This case…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API