Aetna Insurance v. Hobbs
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentHoch, J.
It is with regret that I find myself unable
to concur in this decision. Various issues are involved, but in an effort to keep this statement within reasonable limits I shall limit it to the premium tax, which is the heart of the controversy.
First, as to the nature of the so-called premium tax. It is not in fact a tax upon insurance premiums. It is not assessed against any particular activities or transactions. It is simply a privilege tax— a tax exacted annually from certain foreign (out of state) companies for the privilege of transacting their insurance business in this state. (Pac. Mutual…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.