Md. Cas. Co. v. Indus. Accident Comm'n
California Supreme Court
PBOCEEDING in Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is a proceeding in certiorari under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, to review an award made by the Industrial Accident Commission against the Maryland Casualty Company in favor of Huida Y. Dobson, as compensation for the death of her husband, alleged to have occurred from an accident while in the employ of George C. Ellis. The award was made against the Maryland Casualty Company as insurance carrier for Ellis. Its claim is that the policy of insurance does not cover the accident which caused the death of Dobson.
The insurance policy was issued to Ellis by the Casualty Company of America.…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Booth v. Seaboard Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1968
- Pistolesi v. Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins.District Court, N.D. California · 1945
- Siskin v. Alliance InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926