Legal Opinion
Rich v. Hersl
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided July 20, 2023No. 1:20-cv-00488Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND ERIC RICH, * * Plaintiff, * . vs. . * , * Civil Action No. ADC-20-488 DANIEL HERSL, * Defendant. * RRRAK KR RRR RR RR RR RRR KOR ROE MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Daniel Hersl moves this Court for summary judgment on Plaintiff Eric Rich’s Amended Complaint. ECF Nos. 17, 92. After considering Defendant’s Motion and the responses thereto (ECF Nos. 92, 96, 101), the Court finds that no hearing is necessary. Loc.R. 105.6 (D.Md. 2021).! For the reasons stated herein, Defendant Hersl’s Motion is GRANTED. FACTUAL BACKGROUND This case…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Christina Jacobs v. N.C. Admin. Office of the CourtsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.