Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Arrendale
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 16, 1966No. 41611PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Bbll, Presiding Judge.
The equity features originally a part of this case are not before us for consideration. Therefore, this court has jurisdiction.
In connection with plaintiffs’ motion for judgment n.o.v., the only question is whether the evidence demanded a verdict based upon a finding that the debt was usurious.
Evidence adduced at the trial showed that plaintiffs as makers gave their note made to Mrs. Della B. Arrendale as payee in the sum of $16,229.36 due June 24, 1960. On March 31, 1960, plaintiffs renewed this indebtedness and borrowed an additional $7,000. As evidence of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bank of Lumpkin v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Walton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
- Bellerby v. GoodwynSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Loganville Banking Co. v. ForresterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Bishop v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Holt v. RickettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Williams v. First Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Tankersley v. Security National Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Boyd v. HeadIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.