Legal Opinion

Urbanak v. Hinde

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 7, 1986No. Nos. 85-698, 85-1381PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

Richard Urbanak, a plaintiff below, appeals from a final judgment entered on a favorable jury verdict from which the jury, pursuant to the trial court’s instruction, deducted workers’ compensation of a specified amount paid to Urbanak by the Federal Government.1 Because we conclude that the instruction and the consequent deduction were incorrect, we remand the case to the trial court with directions to enter a modified final judgment.

During the course of his employment by the Federal Government’s National Weather Service, Urbanak was severely injured when a fork lift…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. LorenzettiSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. City of Boca Raton v. GidmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. Purdy v. Gulf Breeze Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Paradis v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  5. Smith v. RyanSupreme Court of Florida · 1949

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Goble v. FrohmanSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Caruso v. BaumleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API