Legal Opinion

Goble v. Frohman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 28, 2005No. SC03-1245PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

901 So.2d 830 (2005)

Albert GOBLE, Petitioner,

v.

Mark E. FROHMAN, Respondent.

No. SC03-1245.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 28, 2005.

Charles P. Schropp, Amy S. Farrior and Raymond T. Elligett, Jr. of Schropp, Buell and Elligett, P.A., Tampa, FL and Theodore E. Karatinos and Timothy F. Prugh of Prugh, Holliday, Deem and Karatinos, P.L., Tampa, FL, for Petitioner.

Daniel P. Mitchell of Gray, Harris and Robinson, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Respondent.

Roy D. Wasson of Wasson and Associates, Miami, FL on behalf of the Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers; Warren B. Kwavnick of Cooney, Mattson, Lance, Blackburn,…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence · Lewis; Concurrence · Lewis.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moorhead v. Crozer Chester Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Joshua v. City of GainesvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. State v. J.M.Supreme Court of Florida · 2002
  4. Seagrave v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. Cooperative Leasing, Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Howell v. HAMILTON MEATS & PROVISIONS, INC.California Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Stanley v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Lopez v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Swanson v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Aumand v. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API