Delaney v. McDonald's Corp.

McDonald’s Corporation, defendant and third-party plaintiff, appeals from the granting of the motion for summary judgment of the CECO Corporation (CECO), third-party defendant. Third-party plaintiff argues on appeal that the trial court erred because the Supreme Court Rule 103(b) (134 Ill. 2d R. 103(b)) dismissal of the complaint of plaintiff,

Thomas Delaney, against CECO did not bar the third-party complaint against CECO.

On January 17, 1989, plaintiff filed a complaint against McDonald’s, CECO, and four other defendants alleging that he was injured on January 16, 1987, while working on a…