Legal Opinion

Vroegh v. J & M Forklift

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 20, 1993No. Nos. 1—91—4058, 1—91—4059, 1—91—4064 consPublished

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Egan

The plaintiff has filed a petition for rehearing from our affirmance of the judgment in favor of ANR and against the plaintiff, and ANR has filed a petition for rehearing from our reversal of the judgment in favor of ANR and against Petrolane and Worthington. Pursuant to our order, ANR has responded to the plaintiff's petition, and Petrolane and Worthington have responded to ANR’s petition. We will first consider the plaintiff’s petition.

In the petition for rehearing the plaintiff now argues that he should be permitted to plead the same allegations that Petrolane and Worthington have pleaded…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Skinner v. Reed-Prentice Division Package MacHinery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Gibson v. LeonardIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Taake v. WHGK, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Esworthy v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Kramer v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API