Beasley v. Huntley Estates at Ardsley, Inc.

This is an action by a property owner against a neighboring owner, a developer and a contractor to recover for alleged damage to plaintiff’s premises caused by *44blasting operations on the neighboring premises. It appears that the plaintiff carried extended coverage insurance at the time of her alleged damages were sustained and that she did accept the sum of $6,000 in liquidation of her insurance company’s obligation to pay such damages. This was under an arrangement whereby the company in effect advanced this sum to her with the understanding that it must be repaid to the company from the…