Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Lenoir Transfer Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 5, 1980No. 7910IC1060PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

We note at the outset that defendants have attempted to place their own exceptions in the record without formally including cross-assignments of error in the record as required by Appellate Rule 10(c)-(d). We therefore decline to consider these exceptions.

The first issue presented in this case is whether the Hearing Commissioner erred in refusing to admit some evidence of the physical and mental condition of the deceased employee. Without setting out each excluded item, we hold that it was error to exclude such evidence of decedent’s suffering. First, the evidence is relevant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Branham v. Denny Roll & Panel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Petty v. Associated Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Harper v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Barber v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Howard v. . WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ballenger v. Burris Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Fayne v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Kahle v. Plochman, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Thompson v. Lenoir Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Thompson Ex Rel. Harvey v. CISSON CONST.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API