Garnett v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The only issue to be resolved in this case is whether a motion for a new trial is an appropriate remedy to seek relief from a conviction based upon a plea of guilty to a criminal charge. The briefs present additional issues with respect to the obligation of the district court to hold a hearing prior to denying the motion for a new trial and the denial by the district court of a motion for peremptory disqualification. We hold that a motion for a new trial will not lie to attack a judgment and sentence based upon a plea of guilty, and the district court did not err in denying…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Crozier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Goodman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Opie v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
- Laird v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
- Tompkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rude v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Mellott v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- McCarthy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Garnett v. BrockWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. CarrNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.