Legal Opinion

Garnett v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1989No. 86-294PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The only issue to be resolved in this case is whether a motion for a new trial is an appropriate remedy to seek relief from a conviction based upon a plea of guilty to a criminal charge. The briefs present additional issues with respect to the obligation of the district court to hold a hearing prior to denying the motion for a new trial and the denial by the district court of a motion for peremptory disqualification. We hold that a motion for a new trial will not lie to attack a judgment and sentence based upon a plea of guilty, and the district court did not err in denying…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Crozier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Goodman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Opie v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Laird v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Tompkins v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rude v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Mellott v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. McCarthy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Garnett v. BrockWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. CarrNebraska Supreme Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API